July Trade Data: Significant Growth Remains Elusive

Josh Green | August 17, 2010

The word from the Panjiva research team: global trade activity held steady again in July.  Specifically, there was a 0.2% increase in the number of global manufacturers shipping to the U.S. market, as well as a 0.5% increase in the number of U.S. companies receiving waterborne shipments from global manufacturers.

These days, macro indicators tell a muddled story about the trajectory of the U.S. economy.  Similarly, our data suggests that we’re holding steady but certainly doesn’t point to a robust recovery:

  • The number of waterborne shipments coming into the U.S. experienced another 2% month-over-month increase from June to July.  While good news, it’s important to keep in mind that this month-over-month increase compares unfavorably to the 12% June-to-July increase in 2009 and the 8% June-to-July increase in 2008.
  • The percentage of significant manufacturers on the Panjiva Watch List declined slightly from 16% to 15%.
  • The percentage of significant buyers having done business with a Panjiva Watch List supplier in the preceding three months held steady at 23%.
  • A final bit of good news:  for the past three months, there have been over 1 million shipments to the U.S. — a streak that we haven’t seen since October of 2008.

Methodological notes:

  • Manufacturers that have suffered a 50% or greater decline in volume shipped to American customers in the most recent three month period, versus the same period a year ago, are on the Panjiva Watch List.
  • “Significant manufacturers” are companies that have sent 10 or more shipments to American customers within the last year. As of the end of July , there were 93,911 significant manufacturers.
  • “Significant buyers” are U.S. companies that have received 10 or more shipments from overseas manufacturers within the last year. As of the end of July, there were 80,898 significant buyers.

A Quiz For Sourcing Executives

Josh Green | August 5, 2010

Over at Apparel Magazine, we’ve got a new opinion piece — There Isn’t a Next China: Now What?

We discuss the challenges created by rising prices in China and suggest that sourcing executives ask themselves four questions:

1) Can my sourcing organization regularly evaluate different regions and countries to evaluate whether they are suitable sourcing destinations?

2) Can my sourcing organization create short-lists of potential suppliers in any region or country?

3) Can my sourcing organization work with suppliers to drive process improvements that reduce the amount of labor required for each item we manufacture?

4) Can my sourcing organization do all these things — as well as all the traditional sourcing activities — with fewer people than ever before?

To read more, visit:

http://apparelmag.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm=&type=MultiPublishing&mod=PublishingTitles&mid=CD746117C0BB4828857A1831CE707DBE&tier=4&id=F4F80B43529848B999A38A60CB5697C8