Triple Trouble, But No Hurry, For Automakers Ahead of Tariff Review — Panjiva
MENU

Panjiva_research_logo

Triple Trouble, But No Hurry, For Automakers Ahead of Tariff Review

Cons. Discr. - Autos 778 European Union 504 Japan 450 South Korea 452 Tariffs 1483 Trade Deals 795 U.S. 3910

The Trump administration’s section 232 “national security” investigation of the automotive industry is close to a conclusion. In May the White House gave the U.S. Trade Representative until Nov. 13 to report back on whether trade negotiations with Japan and the EU were sufficient to avert the need for wide-ranging automotive tariffs. There’s also a decision due on whether to act on the Commerce Department’s earlier report on the investigation – which has remained private – as outlined in Panjiva’s research of Oct. 1.

On top of the section 232 uncertainty, the industry also faces uncertainties from the implementation of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The passage of USMCA into U.S. law has been delayed, while the Trump administration wants to intervene directly in corporate supply chain planning, Bloomberg reports.

The two regulatory challenges come as the industry is already facing challenges from slowing sales. Panjiva’s analysis of official data shows total U.S. sales fell 1.8% year over year in October after a 0.6% rise in 3Q. Sales of foreign-built vehicles climbed 0.5%, including a 1.7% rise in light truck sales in October.

TRUCKS BEAT CARS, FOREIGN BEATS DOMESTIC

Chart segments change in U.S. auto sales by vehicle origin and class. Calculations based on BEA data.  Source: Panjiva

The major automakers appear to expect a return to growth in sales. Panjiva data shows imports of completed vehicles climbed 5.4% year over year in September, including a 6.6% surge in shipments from Japan and an 18.8% rise in shipments from South Korea. The improvements are not universal though, with shipments from the EU having fallen by 2.5% and imports from Canada / Mexico were unchanged.

SOUTH KOREAN AND JAPANESE AUTOMAKERS MORE OPTIMISTIC THAN EUROPE’S

Chart segments change in U.S. imports of cars and light trucks by origin.  Source: Panjiva

The outcome of the section 232 case is more likely to focus on parts than vehicles. There are few signs thought that carmakers are stockpiling ahead of the tariff review. Indeed, it appears that weakness in auto sales is a bigger driver.

Total seaborne imports of auto components fell 0.6% year over year in 3Q after a 5.8% slide in 2Q. Indeed, preliminary data for October suggests a drop of 12.8% in October which would bring the three month decline to Oct. 31 to 5.7% versus a year earlier.

Among the major automakers the biggest decline was in imports associated with General Motors which fell 38.0% year over year in the three months to Oct. 31. That likely reflected the strike that disrupted the company’s operations for most of the month. 

A decline in shipments linked to Ford of 19.8% may reflect a shift of sourcing within its North American supply chain. The Japanese manufacturers also saw a decline despite their rise in shipments of vehicles, with imports linked to Toyota down 4.1%, while Nissan‘s fell 6.0%, and Honda‘s dropped 8.8%. 

There were few signs of expansion. Imports linked to Jaguar Land Rover rose 3.5%, likely due in support of increasing sales of vehicles produced overseas. Subaru‘s parts imports likely rose by just 0.6% in the past three months after a surge in October, though that could soon reverse given problems faced by one of Subaru’s suppliers in Japan after a recent typhoon.

WIDESPREAD DOWNTURN IN AUTO COMPONENT IMPORTS

Chart segments change in U.S. seaborne imports of selected auto parts by consignee.  Source: Panjiva

PANJIVA RESEARCH is a service provided by Panjiva, Inc. ("Panjiva") to relevant global subscribers, and are deemed to be Panjiva "Services" subject to the Panjiva Terms & Conditions of Use. Information contained within or made available via the Services is for informational purposes only and nothing in the Services shall constitute or be construed as an offering of financial instruments, or as investment advice or recommendations by Panjiva, Inc. or its affiliates of an investment strategy or whether to "buy", "sell" or "hold" an investment. The Services may include views and commentary about customers of Panjiva. No aspect of the Services is based on consideration of your individual circumstances, and you should determine on your own whether you agree with the information contained within or made available via the Services. Employees involved in Panjiva Research may hold positions in securities analyzed or discussed in the Services. Panjiva does not make any express or implied warranties, representations, endorsements or conditions with respect to the Services and the information contained within or made available via the Services, including without limitation, warranties as to the usefulness, completeness, accuracy, currentness, reliability or sufficiency of any information (including, without limitation, conclusions, statements, opinions, estimates, forecasts or projections of any kind) and expressly disclaims any implied warranties. Neither this disclaimer nor any of its contents may be forwarded or redistributed without the prior written consent of Panjiva. © 2020 S&P Global. All Rights Reserved.